↓ Skip to main content

学会託児所の設置に役立つ情報と今後の課題

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Tokyo Women's Medical University, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
学会託児所の設置に役立つ情報と今後の課題
Published in
Journal of Tokyo Women's Medical University, December 2017
DOI 10.24488/jtwmu.87.6_165
Authors

西山 圭子, 小森 万希子, 立石 実, 松本 卓子, 冨澤 康子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Lecturer 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,352,543
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Tokyo Women's Medical University
#3
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,670
of 446,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Tokyo Women's Medical University
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.