↓ Skip to main content

A bidentate Polycomb Repressive-Deubiquitinase complex is required for efficient activity on nucleosomes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
25 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A bidentate Polycomb Repressive-Deubiquitinase complex is required for efficient activity on nucleosomes
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-06186-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Attachment of ubiquitin to lysine 119 of Histone 2A (H2AK119Ub) is an epigenetic mark characteristic of repressed developmental genes, which is removed by the Polycomb Repressive-Deubiquitinase (PR-DUB) complex. Here we report the crystal structure of the Drosophila PR-DUB, revealing that the deubiquitinase Calypso and its activating partner ASX form a 2:2 complex. The bidentate Calypso-ASX complex is generated by dimerisation of two activated Calypso proteins through their coiled-coil regions. Disrupting the Calypso dimer interface does not affect inherent catalytic activity, but inhibits removal of H2AK119Ub as a consequence of impaired recruitment to nucleosomes. Mutating the equivalent surface on the human counterpart, BAP1, also compromises activity on nucleosomes. Together, this suggests that high local concentrations drive assembly of bidentate PR-DUB complexes on chromatin-providing a mechanistic basis for enhanced PR-DUB activity at specific genomic foci, and the impact of distinct classes of PR-DUB mutations in tumorigenesis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#619,860
of 34,515,982 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#10,156
of 83,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,311
of 382,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#188
of 1,459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,515,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.