| Title |
Cardiac rehabilitation:
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp08x342219 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hugh JN Bethell, Robert JP Lewin, Hasnain M Dalal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 19% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2022.
All research outputs
#561,582
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#239
of 4,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,082
of 89,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.