↓ Skip to main content

Locating and characterizing binding sites on proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, May 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
11 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Locating and characterizing binding sites on proteins
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, May 1996
DOI 10.1038/nbt0596-595
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This review article begins with a discussion of fundamental differences between substrates and inhibitors, and some of the assumptions and goals underlying the design of a new ligand to a target protein. An overview is given of the methods currently used to locate and characterize ligand binding sites on protein surfaces, with focus on a novel approach: multiple solvent crystal structures (MSCS). In this method, the X-ray crystal structure of the target protein is solved in a variety of organic solvents. Each type of solvent molecule serves as a probe for complementary binding sites on the protein. The probe distribution on the protein surface allows the location of binding sites and the characterization of the potential ligand interactions within these sites. General aspects of the application of the MSCS method to porcine pancreatic elastase is discussed, and comparison of the results with those from X-ray crystal structures of elastase/inhibitor complexes is used to illustrate the potential of the method in aiding the process of rational drug design.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Poland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 107 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 26%
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 19%
Chemistry 17 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2026.
All research outputs
#3,280,314
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#3,673
of 8,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,688
of 27,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.