↓ Skip to main content

The importance of combined NGS and MLPA genetic tests for differential diagnosis of maturity onset diabetes of the young

Overview of attention for article published in Endokrynologia Polska, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The importance of combined NGS and MLPA genetic tests for differential diagnosis of maturity onset diabetes of the young
Published in
Endokrynologia Polska, February 2019
DOI 10.5603/ep.a2018.0064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jovana Komazec, Vera Zdravkovic, Silvija Sajic, Maja Jesic, Marina Andjelkovic, Sonja Pavlovic, Milena Ugrin

Abstract

Maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a rare form of monogenic diabetes. Being clinically and genetically heterogeneous, it is often misdiagnosed as type 1 or type 2 diabetes, leading to inappropriate therapy. MODY is caused by a single gene mutation. Thirteen genes, defining 13 subtypes, have been identified to cause MODY. A correct diagnosis is important for the right therapy, prognosis and genetic counseling. Twenty nine unrelated pediatric patients clinically suspected to have MODY diabetes were analyzed using TruSight One panel for next generation sequencing (NGS) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay. In this study we identified variants in MODY genes in 22 out of 29 patients (75.9%). Using two genetic tests, NGS and MLPA, we detected both single nucleotide variants and large deletions in patients. Most of the patients harbored a variant in the GCK gene (11/22), followed by HNF1B (5/22). The rest of variants were found in the NEUROD1 and HNF1A genes. We identified one novel variant in the GCK gene: c.596T>C, p.Val199Ala. The applied genetic tests excluded the suspected diagnosis of MODY in two patients and reviled variants in other genes possibly associated with patient's clinical phenotype. In our group of MODY patients most variants were found in the GCK gene, followed by variants in HNF1B, NEUROD1 and HNF1A genes. The combined NGS and MLPA based genetic tests presented a comprehensive approach for analyzing patients with suspected MODY diabetes and provided a successful differential diagnosis of MODY subtypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 25%
Unspecified 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Endokrynologia Polska
#212
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,265
of 367,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endokrynologia Polska
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.