You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PAHs Underfoot: Contaminated Dust from Coal-Tar Sealcoated Pavement is Widespread in the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1021/es802119h |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter C. Van Metre, Barbara J. Mahler, Jennifer T. Wilson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 25 | 34% |
| Engineering | 16 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2015.
All research outputs
#2,866,371
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#3,368
of 20,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,845
of 180,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#12
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.