↓ Skip to main content

Using quantile regression to create baseline norms for neuropsychological tests

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using quantile regression to create baseline norms for neuropsychological tests
Published in
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.dadm.2015.11.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Uniform Data Set (UDS) contains neuropsychological test scores and demographic information for participants at Alzheimer's disease centers across the United States funded by the National Institute on Aging. Mean regression analysis of neuropsychological tests has been proposed to detect cognitive decline, but the approach requires stringent assumptions. We propose using quantile regression to directly model conditional percentiles of neuropsychological test scores. An online application allows users to easily implement the proposed method. Scores from 13 different neuropsychological tests were analyzed for 5413 cognitively normal participants in the UDS. Quantile and mean regression models were fit using age, gender, and years of education. Differences between the mean and quantile regression estimates were found on the individual measures. Quantile regression provides more robust estimates of baseline percentiles for cognitively normal adults. This can then serve as standards against which to detect individual cognitive decline.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 26%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Mathematics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,693,067
of 27,521,156 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
#433
of 952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,007
of 402,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,521,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.