↓ Skip to main content

Monte Carlo determination of kQ and kQmsr values for the exradin A26 ionisation chamber for the Varian TrueBeam

Overview of attention for article published in Physics in Medicine & Biology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Monte Carlo determination of kQ and kQmsr values for the exradin A26 ionisation chamber for the Varian TrueBeam
Published in
Physics in Medicine & Biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1088/1361-6560/aae0e9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have calculated conversion factors, k Q for the A26 micro ionisation chamber along with machine specific reference beam quality factors, k Qmsr, for a number of field sizes and beam qualities for the Varian TrueBeam accelerator. The A12 ionisation chamber was simulated alongside the A26, so as to validate against known literature values. Both ionisation chambers were modelled from manufacturer data sheets and schematics. The egs_chamber Monte Carlo user code was used to simulate each absorbed dose relevant to the beam quality conversion factors k Q and k Qmsr. Tabulated spectra for beam energies of 4 through 25 MV were used in the k Q calculations for both investigated chambers. Varian TrueBeam phase space files for 6 MV flattened as well as 6 and 10 MV unflattened beams were used in the simulations of the A26 chamber in field sizes from 2  ×  2 cm square to 20  ×  20 cm square in order to determine k Qmsr values. The PDD(10)x  values of the tabulated spectra were found to be within variation between studies, with an average deviance of 0.4% from one prior study. The simulated A12 k Q values matched the accepted literature values with an average variation of  <0.1%. The A26 k Q values match the manufacturer provided values to within 0.5%. For all investigated field sizes the k Qmsr values are within 0.006 of unity. There is no published data for this chamber for a direct comparison, but there is similarity between these results and results from other chambers regularly used in similar circumstances. Furthermore, the agreement of the simulated k Q values to knowns, and the agreement of the PDD(10)x  factors would suggest the correctness and accuracy of the study.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Energy 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2018.
All research outputs
#27,205,565
of 32,950,213 outputs
Outputs from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#5,663
of 6,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,185
of 371,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#55
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,950,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,784 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.