↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Elevated Serum Pancreastatin Is an Indicator of Hepatic Metastasis in Patients With Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors
Published in
Pancreas, August 2016
DOI 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000572
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Serum pancreastatin is a sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarker in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Elevated pancreastatin levels are associated with worse progression-free survival and overall survival in small-bowel and pancreatic NETs. In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of elevated serum pancreastatin in identifying metastatic disease to the liver. Retrospective chart review of patients with NET managed at a single institution was performed. The site of primary tumor, laboratory data, and presence of metastatic disease were reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for pancreastatin as indicator of liver metastasis were ascertained. Data were abstracted from 77 patient records. Small bowel was the primary tumor site in 44 patients (57%), and 49 patients had metastasis to the liver (64%). Sensitivity and specificity of serum pancreastatin was 85.7% and 66.7%, respectively, which compared with 61.5% and 43.8% for chromogranin A, in identifying liver metastasis in patients with primary tumors of the small bowel. Elevated serum pancreastatin is a sensitive and specific assay for detecting the incidence of liver metastasis in patients with small-bowel NET. Routine measurement of pancreastatin in patients with NET, especially in patients with small-bowel primaries, is supported.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 71%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2016.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Pancreas
#1,470
of 2,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,463
of 381,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pancreas
#40
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,927 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.