↓ Skip to main content

Resilience Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Resilience Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To examine resilience at three months post-traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study is a cross-sectional analysis of an ongoing observational cohort. Five inpatient rehabilitation centers, with 3-month follow-up conducted primarily by telephone. Persons with TBI (n=160) enrolled in the resilience module of the TBI Model System study with 3-month follow-up completed. Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Resilience scores were lower than those of the general population. A multivariable regression model, adjusting for other predictors, showed that higher education, absence of preinjury substance abuse, and less anxiety at follow-up were significantly related to greater resilience. Analysis suggests that lack of resilience may be an issue for some individuals after moderate to severe TBI. Identifying persons most likely at risk for low resilience may be useful in planning clinical interventions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 6 5%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 21%
Psychology 20 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 38 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,451,253
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#1,772
of 7,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,406
of 440,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#25
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.