↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Detection of Hematozoa Infections in Tundra Swans Relative to Migration Patterns and Ecological Conditions at Breeding Grounds

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Detection of Hematozoa Infections in Tundra Swans Relative to Migration Patterns and Ecological Conditions at Breeding Grounds
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0045789
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew M. Ramey, Craig R. Ely, Joel A. Schmutz, John M. Pearce, Darryl J. Heard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Mexico 1 1%
Lithuania 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 69 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 27%
Student > Master 16 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 49%
Environmental Science 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#2,797,241
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,245
of 194,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,923
of 171,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#617
of 4,423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.