↓ Skip to main content

Defects in metal–organic frameworks: a compromise between adsorption and stability?

Overview of attention for article published in Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Defects in metal–organic frameworks: a compromise between adsorption and stability?
Published in
Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2016
DOI 10.1039/c5dt04330a
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Defect engineering has arisen as a promising approach to tune and optimise the adsorptive performance of metal-organic frameworks. However, the balance between enhanced adsorption and structural stability remains an open question. Here both CO2 adsorption capacity and mechanical stability are calculated for the zirconium-based UiO-66, which is subject to systematic variations of defect scenarios. Modulator-dependence, defect concentration and heterogeneity are explored in isolation. Mechanical stability is shown to be compromised at high pressures where uptake is enhanced with an increase in defect concentration. Nonetheless this reduction in stability is minimised for reo type defects and defects with trifluoroacetate substitution. Finally, heterogeneity and auxeticity may also play a role in overcoming the compromise between adsorption and stability.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 189 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 24%
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Master 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 60 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 59 31%
Chemical Engineering 26 14%
Materials Science 17 9%
Engineering 13 7%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 65 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#21,397,388
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#9,030
of 24,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,545
of 447,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#460
of 2,104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,628 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.