You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Closed-loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, 12-week randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31947-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Tauschmann, Hood Thabit, Lia Bally, Janet M Allen, Sara Hartnell, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Yue Ruan, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Peiyao Cheng, Roy W Beck, Carlo L Acerini, Mark L Evans, David B Dunger, Daniela Elleri, Fiona Campbell, Richard M Bergenstal, Amy Criego, Viral N Shah, Lalantha Leelarathna, Roman Hovorka, APCam11 Consortium, B Alvarado, C Ashanti, J Baggott, K Balakrishnan, N Barber, L Bath, S Beasley, C Beatson, S Borgman, S Bradshaw, B Bugielski, Carlson, E Collett, J Curtis, J Demmitt, D Donahue, J Exall, R Forshaw, J Hayes, S Heath, A Hellmann, V Huegel, J Hyatt, L James, H Joseph, P Joshee, W Konerza, J Lum, M Madden, T Martens, C McCarthy, M McDonald, V Mikityuk, H Miles, D Miller, W Mubita, C Murphy, B Olson, R Pad, N Patibandla, K Riding, A Shaju, LA Thomas, J Thomson, D White, S Yau, J Yong |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 17% |
| Spain | 13 | 12% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 14% |
| Scientists | 12 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 412 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Other | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 8% |
| Researcher | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 57 | 14% |
| Unknown | 177 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 7% |
| Engineering | 20 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 47 | 11% |
| Unknown | 190 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 300. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2026.
All research outputs
#143,600
of 34,137,736 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,810
of 51,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,403
of 386,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#42
of 419 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,137,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 419 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.