↓ Skip to main content

Paradoxical Infrastructures

Overview of attention for article published in Science, Technology, & Human Values, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
310 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Paradoxical Infrastructures
Published in
Science, Technology, & Human Values, December 2015
DOI 10.1177/0162243915620017
Authors

Cymene Howe, Jessica Lockrem, Hannah Appel, Edward Hackett, Dominic Boyer, Randal Hall, Matthew Schneider-Mayerson, Albert Pope, Akhil Gupta, Elizabeth Rodwell, Andrea Ballestero, Trevor Durbin, Farès el-Dahdah, Elizabeth Long, Cyrus Mody

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 301 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 19%
Researcher 44 14%
Student > Master 41 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Professor 15 5%
Other 66 21%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 144 46%
Arts and Humanities 31 10%
Engineering 12 4%
Environmental Science 10 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 3%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 64 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2016.
All research outputs
#8,540,238
of 32,950,213 outputs
Outputs from Science, Technology, & Human Values
#429
of 988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,629
of 431,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science, Technology, & Human Values
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,950,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.