You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Significance of Extracellular Vesicles in Plasma from Glioblastoma Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1941 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Osti, Massimiliano Del Bene, Germana Rappa, Mark Santos, Vittoria Matafora, Cristina Richichi, Stefania Faletti, Galina V. Beznoussenko, Alexandre Mironov, Angela Bachi, Lorenzo Fornasari, Daniele Bongetta, Paolo Gaetani, Francesco DiMeco, Aurelio Lorico, Giuliana Pelicci |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Portugal | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 15% |
| Researcher | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 62 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,795,862
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#2,356
of 13,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,905
of 452,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#67
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.