↓ Skip to main content

Adult Attachment, Sensory Processing, and Distress in Healthy Adults

Overview of attention for article published in American journal of occupational therapy, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adult Attachment, Sensory Processing, and Distress in Healthy Adults
Published in
American journal of occupational therapy, December 2015
DOI 10.5014/ajot.2016.017376
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To better understand the ways in which adult attachment, sensory processing, and distress may be interrelated in healthy adults. A cross-sectional study design was used with a convenience sample of 116 healthy participants who completed questionnaires before participating in a cold pressor pain-inducement task. Attachment anxiety was significantly positively correlated with sensory sensitivity as measured using the Highly Sensitive Persons Scale and the Sensory Profile and with distress (i.e., stress, anxiety, and depression). Associations between attachment anxiety and both sensory sensitivity variables were lost when controlling for stress. Attachment avoidance was correlated only with sensory sensitivity measured using the Sensory Profile, and this relationship was retained when controlling for stress. Neither the attachment nor the stress variables were associated with sensation seeking. Findings suggest that developing active coping approaches to deal with sensory sensitivities may be a valuable way to minimize distress. Recommendations for future research are provided.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 108 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 42 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 44 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2025.
All research outputs
#11,914,052
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from American journal of occupational therapy
#574
of 1,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,090
of 444,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American journal of occupational therapy
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.