↓ Skip to main content

Rare Anterior Segment Retinoblastoma Masquerading as Corneal Endotheliitis

Overview of attention for article published in Eye and Contact Lens, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rare Anterior Segment Retinoblastoma Masquerading as Corneal Endotheliitis
Published in
Eye and Contact Lens, January 2016
DOI 10.1097/icl.0000000000000113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alla Kelly, Stephen C. Kaufman, Rasha Ali, Alana Grajewski, Jill Anderson

Abstract

We present a unique case involving a 6-year-old female with a unilateral corneal endotheliitis-like finding, who was ultimately found to have a form of anterior diffuse infiltrating retinoblastoma with no evidence of retinal involvement. The patient's presumed endotheliitis was initially treated with topical dexamethasone and oral acyclovir without improvement. She then underwent multiple fine-needle aspirations of anterior chamber fluid, which were negative for abnormal findings of viral polymerase chain reaction, viral cultures, and flow cytometry. Months after initial presentation, an anterior chamber angle mass developed and a biopsy identified retinoblastoma cells. The patient underwent plaque radiotherapy of the cornea and systemic chemotherapy. The patient regained good vision and is tumor-free at 13 months. Anterior inflammation is a rare form of masquerade syndrome associated with retinoblastoma; however, it tends to be associated with diffuse posterior segment retinoblastoma when it does occur. Diffuse anterior retinoblastoma is a rare form of retinoblastoma with no apparent focus in the retina. Ultimately, our patient developed an anterior chamber angle lesion, which was biopsied and proven to be retinoblastoma. Unusual corneal endotheliitis-like findings in children that are not responsive to conventional treatment should raise the clinician's suspicion of malignancy, even when no retinal lesion is detected.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 21%
Other 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2015.
All research outputs
#27,765,099
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Eye and Contact Lens
#568
of 972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,473
of 446,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eye and Contact Lens
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.