↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
MRI reveals hemodynamic changes with acute maternal hyperoxygenation in human fetuses with and without congenital heart disease
Published in
Prenatal Diagnosis, February 2016
DOI 10.1002/pd.4762
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We investigated the physiologic impact of acute maternal hyperoxygenation (MH) in human fetuses with and without congenital heart disease (CHD) using fetal cardiac MR (CMR) in order to explore the potential therapeutic benefits of chronic MH. We examined 17 normal and 20 late-gestation human fetuses with CHD on a 1.5T CMR system. Flows were measured in major fetal vessels using phase contrast MRI. The T2 of umbilical venous (UV) blood was measured using T2 mapping. The measurements were repeated during acute MH. The results were compared using a Student's t-test, with p-value ≤0.05 considered statistically significant. At baseline, the UV T2 (oxygen saturation) was lower in CHD fetuses than in normals, with significant increase with MH (p=0.01). Both groups showed significant increase in pulmonary blood flow during MH, which was more dramatic in CHD (p=0.005). There was a reduction in ductus arteriosus flow in CHD during MH (p=0.04). There was no significant difference in blood flow in any of the other major vessels. This study suggests that fetal MR identifies the expected hemodynamic changes associated with acute MH. MRI could be useful as a method for monitoring the impact of chronic MH in fetuses with CHD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Prenatal Diagnosis
#341
of 2,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,856
of 409,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prenatal Diagnosis
#20
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.