↓ Skip to main content

Nurses perspectives on long‐term condition self‐management: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nurses perspectives on long‐term condition self‐management: a qualitative study
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, December 2015
DOI 10.1111/jocn.13072
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study explored nurses' attitudes, views and beliefs about their role in long-term condition self-management. Nurses are well-placed to assist individuals in long-term condition self-management. Yet, there is limited research exploring underlying beliefs of nurses regarding their role in long-term condition self-management and how those beliefs may impact on the practice of self-management. A descriptive, cross-sectional qualitative design. A purposive sample of nurses (n = 14) working in primary care and secondary care settings in New Zealand. One focus group and two interviews were conducted. Data were analysed through thematic analysis by the three authors. All nurses interviewed described promoting patient self-management of long-term conditions and the approaches they took to do so in practice. The nurses described a strong sense of accountability in relation to their practice. They worked to ensure patient follow-up and referrals as necessary and described themselves as lynch pins in the management of long-term conditions. Nurses also recognised that patients would engage at different levels in the self-management process. However, the sense of accountability did raise a question around the balance between professional accountability and responsibility for the management of the condition and the reality of nurses' ability to work with patients as partners in the self-management of long-term conditions. Nurses described both understanding of the importance of promoting patient self-management but also a strong sense of professional accountability to provide quality care. Nurses recognised that they needed to work to find a balance between these two positions. In order for nurses to work as an advocate to support optimal care it is vital that nurses recognise where patient's boundaries and capabilities lie. Nurses are at risk of blurring the boundaries and may not always support people to make choices that promote and/or maintain "self" control (or autonomy) in long-term condition management.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Lecturer 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 35%
Psychology 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 27 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2016.
All research outputs
#22,620,906
of 27,684,125 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#4,944
of 5,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,243
of 403,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#54
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,684,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.