↓ Skip to main content

福島県川俣町養蚕業および霊山町天蚕業への放射性物質の影響

Overview of attention for article published in Sanshi-Konchu Biotec, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
福島県川俣町養蚕業および霊山町天蚕業への放射性物質の影響
Published in
Sanshi-Konchu Biotec, May 2014
DOI 10.11416/konchubiotec.83.1_039
Authors

加藤 駿, 石崎 良祐, 三橋 亮太, 清水 智恵, 島田 順, 普後 一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2015.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Sanshi-Konchu Biotec
#31
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,845
of 242,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sanshi-Konchu Biotec
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.