↓ Skip to main content

A retrospective analysis of patients who were switched from methadone to a different opioid: How to treat cancer pain after patients become unable to take methadone orally at the end of life

Overview of attention for article published in Palliative Care Research, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A retrospective analysis of patients who were switched from methadone to a different opioid: How to treat cancer pain after patients become unable to take methadone orally at the end of life
Published in
Palliative Care Research, January 2015
DOI 10.2512/jspm.10.245
Authors

Takayasu Itakura, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Sachiko Okayama, Kaori Tohno, Rie Hiyoshi, Kozue Yoshida, Sachiko Kimura, Hideki Noma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,363,883
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Palliative Care Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,485
of 361,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palliative Care Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them