↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Predictors of Radiotherapy Response in Sarcoma

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Oncology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Molecular Predictors of Radiotherapy Response in Sarcoma
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11864-015-0381-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Soft-tissue sarcoma is one of the few clinical cancer models in which pre-operative radiotherapy is commonly utilized and in which tumor response to radiotherapy could be assessed. However, clinical and histopathological features of soft-tissue sarcomas are not useful in predicting tumor radiotherapy response. Exploration of predictive markers of sarcoma response to radiotherapy is further confounded by discordance between radiological tumor size reduction, pathological changes, and clinical local recurrence rates. The diversity of disease histology and anatomical origin further influences which type of radiotherapy response (volumetric vs. cytotoxic) would best relate to patient outcome. Advances in molecular biology and understanding of sarcoma biology have recently resulted in the identification of several molecular and imaging predictive markers of radiotherapy response. As the underlying mechanism of radiation-induced cell killing involves the production of DNA damage through the production of oxygen radicals, the most promising biomarkers and imaging markers are related to DNA damage repair genes, hypoxia, and tumor vasculature. As bone and cartilaginous sarcomas are less often treated with radiotherapy, biomarkers of response in these diseases are less examined.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,779,578
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Oncology
#430
of 662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,128
of 392,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Oncology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 662 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.