You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conservation status of freshwater mussels in Europe: state of the art and future challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Reviews, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/brv.12244 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Lopes‐Lima, Ronaldo Sousa, Juergen Geist, David C. Aldridge, Rafael Araujo, Jakob Bergengren, Yulia Bespalaya, Erika Bódis, Lyubov Burlakova, Dirk Van Damme, Karel Douda, Elsa Froufe, Dilian Georgiev, Clemens Gumpinger, Alexander Karatayev, Ümit Kebapçi, Ian Killeen, Jasna Lajtner, Bjørn M. Larsen, Rosaria Lauceri, Anastasios Legakis, Sabela Lois, Stefan Lundberg, Evelyn Moorkens, Gregory Motte, Karl‐Otto Nagel, Paz Ondina, Adolfo Outeiro, Momir Paunovic, Vincent Prié, Ted von Proschwitz, Nicoletta Riccardi, Mudīte Rudzīte, Māris Rudzītis, Christian Scheder, Mary Seddon, Hülya Şereflişan, Vladica Simić, Svetlana Sokolova, Katharina Stoeckl, Jouni Taskinen, Amílcar Teixeira, Frankie Thielen, Teodora Trichkova, Simone Varandas, Heinrich Vicentini, Katarzyna Zajac, Tadeusz Zajac, Stamatis Zogaris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Poland | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 87% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Serbia | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Cambodia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 18% |
| Unknown | 78 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 61 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 92 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#314,464
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#60
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,330
of 405,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.