| Title |
In Silico Driven Design and Synthesis of Rhodanine Derivatives as Novel Antibacterials Targeting the Enoyl Reductase InhA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01620 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Here, we report on the design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 4-thiazolidinone (rhodanine) de-rivatives targeting Mycobacterial tuberculosis (Mtb) trans-2-enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (InhA). Compounds having bulky aromatic substituents at position 5 and a tryptophan residue at position N-3 of the rhodanine ring were the most active against InhA with IC50 values ranging from 2.7 µM to 30 µM. The experimental data showed consistent correlations with computational studies. Their anti-microbial activity was assessed against Mycobacterium marinum (Mm) (a model for Mtb), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa), Legionella pneumophila (Lp) and Enterococcus faecalis (Ef), by using anti-infective, anti-virulence and antibiotic assays. 19 out of 34 compounds reduced Mm virulence at 10 µM. 33 exhibited promising antibiotic activity against Mm with a MIC of 0.21 µM and showed up to 89% reduction of Lp growth in an anti-infective assay at 30 µM. 32 showed high antibiotic activity against Ef with a MIC of 0.57 µM. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 17 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |