↓ Skip to main content

In Silico Driven Design and Synthesis of Rhodanine Derivatives as Novel Antibacterials Targeting the Enoyl Reductase InhA

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
In Silico Driven Design and Synthesis of Rhodanine Derivatives as Novel Antibacterials Targeting the Enoyl Reductase InhA
Published in
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, December 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01620
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Here, we report on the design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 4-thiazolidinone (rhodanine) de-rivatives targeting Mycobacterial tuberculosis (Mtb) trans-2-enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (InhA). Compounds having bulky aromatic substituents at position 5 and a tryptophan residue at position N-3 of the rhodanine ring were the most active against InhA with IC50 values ranging from 2.7 µM to 30 µM. The experimental data showed consistent correlations with computational studies. Their anti-microbial activity was assessed against Mycobacterium marinum (Mm) (a model for Mtb), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa), Legionella pneumophila (Lp) and Enterococcus faecalis (Ef), by using anti-infective, anti-virulence and antibiotic assays. 19 out of 34 compounds reduced Mm virulence at 10 µM. 33 exhibited promising antibiotic activity against Mm with a MIC of 0.21 µM and showed up to 89% reduction of Lp growth in an anti-infective assay at 30 µM. 32 showed high antibiotic activity against Ef with a MIC of 0.57 µM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,952,879
of 28,829,220 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#7,207
of 24,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,167
of 422,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#37
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,829,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.