↓ Skip to main content

Recent Progress in Histone Demethylase Inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recent Progress in Histone Demethylase Inhibitors
Published in
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, February 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01758
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is increasing interest in targeting histone N-methyl-lysine demethylases (KDM) with small molecules both for the generation of probes for target exploration and for therapeutic purposes. Here we update on previous reviews on the inhibition of the lysine-specific demethylases (LSDs or KDM1s) and JmjC families of N-methyl-lysine demethylases (JmjC KDMs, KDM2-7) focusing on the academic and patent literature from 2014 to date. We also highlight recent biochemical, biological and structural studies which are relevant to KDM inhibitor development.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 219 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 22%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 77 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 47 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2025.
All research outputs
#3,635,082
of 27,744,365 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#3,540
of 24,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,168
of 413,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#41
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,744,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.