↓ Skip to main content

The impact of oculomotor functioning on neuropsychological performance in Huntington disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The impact of oculomotor functioning on neuropsychological performance in Huntington disease
Published in
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, January 2016
DOI 10.1080/13803395.2015.1101054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janessa O. Carvalho, Jeffrey D. Long, Holly J. Westervelt, Megan M. Smith, Jared M. Bruce, Ji-In Kim, James A. Mills, Jane S. Paulsen, the PREDICT-HD Investigators and Coordinators of the Huntington Study Group

Abstract

Huntington disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative condition with prominent motor (including oculomotor), cognitive, and psychiatric effects. While neuropsychological deficits are present in HD, motor impairments may impact performance on neuropsychological measures, especially those requiring a speeded response, as has been demonstrated in multiple sclerosis and schizophrenia. The current study is the first to explore associations between oculomotor functions and neuropsychological performance in HD. Participants with impaired oculomotor functioning performed worse than those with normal oculomotor functioning on cognitive tasks requiring oculomotor involvement, particularly on psychomotor speed tasks, controlling for covariates. Consideration of oculomotor dysfunction on neuropsychological performance is critical, particularly for populations with motor deficits.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Other 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Psychology 14 20%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,683,389
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
#575
of 862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,588
of 396,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.