↓ Skip to main content

One Health: An opportunity for an interprofessional approach to healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interprofessional Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
One Health: An opportunity for an interprofessional approach to healthcare
Published in
Journal of Interprofessional Care, December 2015
DOI 10.3109/13561820.2015.1041584
Pubmed ID
Authors

Molly Courtenay, Joelle Sweeney, Paulina Zielinska, Sarah Brown Blake, Roberto La Ragione

Abstract

One Health has been viewed as the collaborative effort between professions and disciplines working locally, nationally, and globally to attain optimal health for people, animals, and the environment. For One Health principles to be operationalised, interprofessional education and interprofessional collaborative practice are essential. However, interprofessional initiatives between the human health professions and veterinary medicine focus primarily on patient care in the human health setting. The purpose of this report is to describe two models of collaboration between human and veterinary medicine that have been designed to address human and animal health challenges in practice. Initiatives that involve this cooperation are providing access to affordable and clean drinking water. Implications linked to these initiatives are explored in relation to the need for an interprofessional approach to attain optimal health for people, animals, and the environment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Other 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 18 26%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,419,268
of 27,768,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Interprofessional Care
#915
of 1,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,027
of 402,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Interprofessional Care
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,768,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.