↓ Skip to main content

Differences Among Overhand, 3-Quarter, and Sidearm Pitching Biomechanics in Professional Baseball Players.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Biomechanics, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 912)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Differences Among Overhand, 3-Quarter, and Sidearm Pitching Biomechanics in Professional Baseball Players.
Published in
Journal of Applied Biomechanics, October 2018
DOI 10.1123/jab.2017-0211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 8 7%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 53 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 28 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Engineering 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 62 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2026.
All research outputs
#2,976,484
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Biomechanics
#49
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,583
of 388,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Biomechanics
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.