↓ Skip to main content

Endothelial PPAR-γ provides vascular protection from IL-1β-induced oxidative stress

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Endothelial PPAR-γ provides vascular protection from IL-1β-induced oxidative stress
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, November 2015
DOI 10.1152/ajpheart.00490.2015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Loss of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) function in vascular endothelium enhances atherosclerosis and nuclear factor-kappa-B (NF-κB) target gene expression in high fat diet fed apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice. The mechanisms by which endothelial PPARγ regulates inflammatory responses and protects against atherosclerosis remain unclear. To assess functional interactions between PPARγ and inflammation, we employed a model of interleukin-1β (IL-1β)-induced aortic dysfunction in transgenic mice with endothelial-specific overexpression of either wildtype (E-WT) or dominant negative PPARγ (E-V290M). IL-1β dose-dependently decreased IκBα, increased phospho-p65, and increased luciferase activity in aorta of NF-κB-Luc transgenic mice. IL-1β also dose-dependently reduced endothelial-dependent relaxation by acetylcholine (ACh). The loss of ACh responsiveness was partially improved by pretreating vessels with the PPARγ agonist, rosiglitazone, or by endothelial overexpression of wildtype PPARγ. Conversely, IL-1β-induced endothelial dysfunction was worsened in aorta from E-V290M mice. Although IL-1β increased expression of NF-κB target genes, an NF-κB p65 inhibitor did not alleviate endothelial dysfunction induced by IL-1β. Tempol, a superoxide dismutase mimetic partially restored ACh responsiveness in IL-1β-treated aorta. Notably, Tempol only modestly improved protection in E-WT but had an increased protective effect in E-V290M compared to aorta from non-transgenic mice (NT), suggesting that PPARγ-mediated protection involves antioxidant effects. IL-1β increased ROS and decreased phospho-eNOS (ser1177)/eNOS ratio in NT aorta. These effects were completely abolished in E-WT aorta, but were worsened in E-V290M aorta even in the absence of IL-1β. We conclude that PPARγ protects against IL-1β-mediated endothelial dysfunction through a reduction of oxidative stress responses, but not by blunting IL-1β-mediated NF-κB activity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2016.
All research outputs
#27,730,492
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#6,515
of 7,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,362
of 318,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#50
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.