↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Pearls in Using Antiarrhythmic Drugs in the Outpatient Setting

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmacy Practice, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Clinical Pearls in Using Antiarrhythmic Drugs in the Outpatient Setting
Published in
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, November 2015
DOI 10.1177/1933719115615878
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A role for oral antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) remains in clinical practice for patients with atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in spite of advances in nonpharmacologic therapy. Pharmacists play a vital role in the appropriate use of AAD dosing, administration, adverse effects, interactions, and monitoring. Pharmacists who are involved in providing care to patients with cardiac arrhythmias must remain updated regarding the efficacy and safety of the most commonly used AADs. This review will address key issues for appropriate initiation and maintenance of commonly selected Vaughan-Williams Class Ic and III agents in the outpatient setting.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2020.
All research outputs
#10,506,087
of 30,529,933 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmacy Practice
#372
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,961
of 414,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmacy Practice
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,529,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.