↓ Skip to main content

Proline-based phosphoramidite reagents for the reductive ligation of S-nitrosothiols

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Antibiotics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Proline-based phosphoramidite reagents for the reductive ligation of S-nitrosothiols
Published in
The Journal of Antibiotics, January 2016
DOI 10.1038/ja.2015.144
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

S-Nitrosothiols (RSNOs) have many biological implications but are rarely used in organic synthesis. In this work we report the development of proline-based phosphoramidite substrates that can effectively convert RSNOs to proline-based sulfenamides through a reductive ligation process. A unique property of this method is that the phosphine oxide moiety on the ligation products can be readily removed under acidic conditions. In conjugation with the facile preparation of RSNOs from the corresponding thiols (RSHs), this method provides a new way to prepare proline-based sulfenamides from simple thiol starting materials.The Journal of Antibiotics advance online publication, 13 January 2016; doi:10.1038/ja.2015.144.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 83%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,439,141
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Antibiotics
#238
of 3,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,486
of 402,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Antibiotics
#12
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.