You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Theory, methods and tools for determining environmental flows for riparian vegetation: riparian vegetation‐flow response guilds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Freshwater Biology, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02206.x |
| Authors |
DAVID M. MERRITT, MICHAEL L. SCOTT, N. LeROY POFF, GREGOR T. AUBLE, DAVID A. LYTLE |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 529 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 3% |
| Canada | 6 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 2 | <1% |
| Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 484 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 124 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 86 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 92 | 17% |
| Unknown | 66 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 197 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 159 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 38 | 7% |
| Engineering | 33 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 2% |
| Unknown | 84 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,345,195
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Biology
#477
of 2,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,430
of 176,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Biology
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.