↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can Schwartz Center Rounds support healthcare staff with emotional challenges at work, and how do they compare with other interventions aimed at providing similar support? A systematic review and scoping reviews
Published in
BMJ Open, October 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024254
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 354 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 12%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 8%
Researcher 24 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 6%
Other 69 19%
Unknown 134 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 62 18%
Psychology 58 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 11%
Social Sciences 17 5%
Arts and Humanities 7 2%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 146 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2025.
All research outputs
#2,657,685
of 29,729,256 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#4,780
of 28,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,697
of 368,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#90
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,729,256 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.