↓ Skip to main content

The impact of a dedicated patent ductus arteriosus ligation team on neonatal health-care outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Perinatology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The impact of a dedicated patent ductus arteriosus ligation team on neonatal health-care outcomes
Published in
Journal of Perinatology, January 2016
DOI 10.1038/jp.2015.213
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The decision to perform patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) ligation is controversial. Patient selection is oftentimes poorly standardized, leading to delays in referral and inappropriate intervention. A system for PDA ligation categorization and triaging process was introduced in 2006 at a quaternary hospital in Canada to streamline referrals and enhance perioperative care. We aimed to evaluate the impact of this dedicated PDA ligation triaging system comparing pre- and postimplementation of this system. We performed a retrospective chart review. Demographic and cardiorespiratory data of neonates ⩽30 weeks gestation age at birth, who were referred for and/or had a PDA ligation performed during two distinct epochs (EPOCH 1 (2003 to 2005) and EPOCH 2 (2010 to 2012)), were analyzed. All surgeries were performed at The Hospital for Sick Children, the regional referral center for PDA ligation. The primary outcome was incidence of PDA ligation and procedural cancellations. Secondary outcomes included postoperative need for cardiovascular or respiratory support. Subgroup analysis was performed in neonates <1000 vs >1000 g at the time of surgery during both epochs. A total of 198 neonates underwent surgery with no difference in baseline demographics between epochs. The incidence of PDA ligation as a proportion of total live births under 30 weeks in Central East Region of Ontario was lower in the second epoch (EPOCH 1: 117/1092 (10.7%) vs EPOCH 2: 81/1520 (5.3%)). During the second epoch, 24% of referrals for surgery were canceled after review by our PDA ligation team. There were no overall differences in the proportion of neonates with oxygenation failure, ventilation failure or Post-Ligation Cardiac Syndrome (PLCS), after surgery, between epochs. The proportion of neonates who developed systemic hypotension was higher in patients <1000 g (n=34 (34%) vs n=17 (17.4%), P=0.01) at the time of surgery. In addition, we identified a reduction in the proportion of neonates <1000 g who developed PLCS in EPOCH 2. On the contrary, there was an increase in the proportion of neonates >1000 g who developed ventilation failure in EPOCH 2. The presence of dedicated triaging and management system enhances efficiency of referral process through careful selection of patients for PDA ligation and optimizes perioperative management. We demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of PDA ligation without any negative impact on short-term neonatal morbidity. The use of targeted neonatal echocardiography in the assessment of PDA shunt volume and guiding postoperative decision making is likely to have contributed to these findings.Journal of Perinatology advance online publication, 14 January 2016; doi:10.1038/jp.2015.213.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,120,995
of 29,895,294 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Perinatology
#2,501
of 3,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,147
of 414,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Perinatology
#49
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,895,294 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.