↓ Skip to main content

Coexistence of a T118M PMP22 missense mutation and chromosome 17 (17p11.2‐p12) deletion

Overview of attention for article published in Muscle & Nerve, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Coexistence of a T118M PMP22 missense mutation and chromosome 17 (17p11.2‐p12) deletion
Published in
Muscle & Nerve, June 2015
DOI 10.1002/mus.24713
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We describe a 6-year-old girl with a T118M PMP22 mutation and heterozygous deletion of PMP22 on chromosome 17 (17p11.2-p12) resulting in a severe sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Case Report Results: Foot pain, cavovarus feet, tibialis anterior atrophy, absent reflexes, and inability to walk were found at age 6. Nerve conduction studies showed evidence of a sensorimotor polyneuropathy and compressive mononeuropathies of bilateral median nerves at the wrist and ulnar nerves at the elbow. Genetic testing revealed a deletion of a PMP22 allele and T118M PMP22 mutation in the remaining allele. The severe presentation of sensory motor polyneuropathy and HNPP in this patient is likely a consequence of both decreased expression of PMP22 causing features consistent with HNPP, and unopposed expression of the T118M mutant form of PMP22 that is relatively benign in the heterozygous state. The T118M mutant form of PMP22 can be disease-modifying in the appropriate circumstances. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Researcher 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Neuroscience 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#19,299,788
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from Muscle & Nerve
#2,292
of 2,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,992
of 269,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Muscle & Nerve
#35
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.