↓ Skip to main content

Ockham’s Razor in memetic computing: Three stage optimal memetic exploration

Overview of attention for article published in Information Sciences, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ockham’s Razor in memetic computing: Three stage optimal memetic exploration
Published in
Information Sciences, April 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2011.11.025
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
China 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 6 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 38%
Engineering 5 13%
Mathematics 4 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#10,566,177
of 32,434,533 outputs
Outputs from Information Sciences
#440
of 2,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,516
of 200,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information Sciences
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,434,533 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,722 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.