↓ Skip to main content

Criteria for Directly Detecting Topological Fermi Arcs in Weyl Semimetals

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Criteria for Directly Detecting Topological Fermi Arcs in Weyl Semimetals
Published in
Physical Review Letters, February 2016
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.116.066802
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The recent discovery of the first Weyl semimetal in TaAs provides the first observation of a Weyl fermion in nature and demonstrates a novel type of anomalous surface state, the Fermi arc. Like topological insulators, the bulk topological invariants of a Weyl semimetal are uniquely fixed by the surface states of a bulk sample. Here we present a set of distinct conditions, accessible by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), each of which demonstrates topological Fermi arcs in a surface state band structure, with minimal reliance on calculation. We apply these results to TaAs and NbP. For the first time, we rigorously demonstrate a nonzero Chern number in TaAs by counting chiral edge modes on a closed loop. We further show that it is unreasonable to directly observe Fermi arcs in NbP by ARPES within available experimental resolution and spectral linewidth. Our results are general and apply to any new material to demonstrate a Weyl semimetal.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 177 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 26%
Researcher 47 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 9%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 130 70%
Materials Science 22 12%
Chemistry 2 1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 27 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#21,637,273
of 32,950,213 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#33,380
of 50,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,211
of 444,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#280
of 574 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,950,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 574 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.