↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Characterization of risk factors for adjuvant radiotherapy-associated pain in a tri-racial/ethnic breast cancer population
Published in
Pain (03043959), May 2016
DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000489
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pain related to cancer or treatment is a critical quality of life (QOL) issue for breast cancer survivors. In a prospective study of 375 breast cancer patients (enrolled during 2008-2014), we characterized the risk factors for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT)-associated pain. Pain score was assessed at pre- and post-RT as the mean of four pain severity items (i.e., pain at its worst, least, average, and now) from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) with 11-point numeric rating scale (0-10). Pain scores of 4-10 were considered clinically-relevant pain. The study consists of 58 non-Hispanic whites (NHW; 15%), 78 black or African Americans (AA; 21%), and 239 Hispanic whites (HW; 64%). Overall, the prevalence of clinically-relevant pain was 16% at pre-RT, 31% at post-RT, and 20% RT-associated increase. In univariate analysis, AA and HW had significantly higher pre- and post-RT pain compared to NHW. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, pre-RT pain was significantly associated with HW and obesity; post-RT pain was significantly associated with AA, HW, younger age, ≥2 comorbid conditions, above median hotspot volume receiving >105% prescribed dose, and pre-RT pain score >4. RT-associated pain was significantly associated with AA (odds ratio [OR]=3.27; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.09-9.82), younger age (OR=2.44, 95% CI=1.24-4.79), and 2 or >3 comorbid conditions (OR=3.06, 95%CI=1.32-7.08; OR=4.61, 95%CI=1.49-14.25, respectively). These risk factors may help to guide RT decision making process, such as hypo-fractionated RT schedule. Furthermore, effective pain management strategies are needed to improve QOL in breast cancer patients with clinically-relevant pain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 20%
Student > Master 10 16%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Psychology 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2016.
All research outputs
#28,960,429
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Pain (03043959)
#7,491
of 8,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,639
of 337,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain (03043959)
#106
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.