You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
イネキンウワバの生態について (第1報)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Kanto-Tosan Plant Protection Society, December 1962
|
| DOI | 10.11337/ktpps1954.1962.53 |
| Authors |
岩本 静之, 高野 誠義 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#21,030,959
of 25,830,005 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Kanto-Tosan Plant Protection Society
#18
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,805
of 9,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Kanto-Tosan Plant Protection Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,005 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them