↓ Skip to main content

Sources of Variation in Waterfowl Survival Rates

Overview of attention for article published in Ornithology, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sources of Variation in Waterfowl Survival Rates
Published in
Ornithology, January 1997
DOI 10.2307/4089068
Authors

David G. Krementz, Richard J. Barker, James D. Nichols

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
United Kingdom 2 4%
France 1 2%
Unknown 48 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 5 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 48%
Environmental Science 16 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Ornithology
#811
of 2,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,960
of 92,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them