↓ Skip to main content

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Final Recommendation Statement.

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
29 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
4 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
554 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Final Recommendation Statement.
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2018
DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.14741
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 554 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 554 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 12%
Student > Bachelor 53 10%
Researcher 50 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 5%
Other 90 16%
Unknown 234 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 14%
Psychology 71 13%
Social Sciences 30 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 1%
Other 40 7%
Unknown 249 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 187. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2025.
All research outputs
#269,297
of 34,518,599 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,416
of 42,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,452
of 394,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#57
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.