↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of a low-dose computed tomography screening programme for lung cancer in New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Lung Cancer (01695002), August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cost-effectiveness of a low-dose computed tomography screening programme for lung cancer in New Zealand
Published in
Lung Cancer (01695002), August 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.08.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 29 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 34 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#12,348,128
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Lung Cancer (01695002)
#1,924
of 4,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,026
of 371,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung Cancer (01695002)
#37
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.