↓ Skip to main content

Pathway-Specific Striatal Substrates for Habitual Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
36 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
29 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
397 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pathway-Specific Striatal Substrates for Habitual Behavior
Published in
Neuron, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.032
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The dorsolateral striatum (DLS) is implicated in habit formation. However, the DLS circuit mechanisms underlying habit remain unclear. A key role for DLS is to transform sensorimotor cortical input into firing of output neurons that project to the mutually antagonistic direct and indirect basal ganglia pathways. Here we examine whether habit alters this input-output function. By imaging cortically evoked firing in large populations of pathway-defined striatal projection neurons (SPNs), we identify features that strongly correlate with habitual behavior on a subject-by-subject basis. Habitual behavior correlated with strengthened DLS output to both pathways as well as a tendency for action-promoting direct pathway SPNs to fire before indirect pathway SPNs. In contrast, habit suppression correlated solely with a weakened direct pathway output. Surprisingly, all effects were broadly distributed in space. Together, these findings indicate that the striatum imposes broad, pathway-specific modulations of incoming activity to render learned motor behaviors habitual.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
France 4 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 379 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 24%
Researcher 86 22%
Student > Bachelor 41 10%
Student > Master 29 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 7%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 62 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 144 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 24%
Psychology 39 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 80 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 321. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#125,406
of 31,849,655 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#139
of 10,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,795
of 430,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#4
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,849,655 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.