↓ Skip to main content

Managing fire‐dependent vegetation in Byron Shire, Australia: Are we restoring the keystone ecological process of fire?

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Management & Restoration, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Managing fire‐dependent vegetation in Byron Shire, Australia: Are we restoring the keystone ecological process of fire?
Published in
Ecological Management & Restoration, January 2016
DOI 10.1111/emr.12194
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 26%
Environmental Science 6 22%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,482,754
of 26,872,836 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Management & Restoration
#278
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,061
of 408,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Management & Restoration
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,872,836 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.