Aluminum alkoxide complexes (2) of salen ligands with a three-carbon linker and para substituents having variable electron-withdrawing capabilities (X = NO2, Br, OMe) were prepared, and the kinetics of their ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of ε-caprolactone (CL) were investigated as a function of temperature, with the aim of drawing comparisons to similar systems with two-carbon linkers investigated previously (1). While 1 and 2 exhibit saturation kinetics and similar dependences of their ROP rates on substituents X (invariant K eq, similar Hammett ρ = +1.4(1) and 1.2(1) for k 2, respectively), ROP by 2 was significantly faster than for 1. Theoretical calculations confirm that, while the reactant structures differ, the transition state geometries are quite similar, and by analyzing the energetics of the involved distortions accompanying the structural changes, a significant contribution to the basis for the rate differences was identified. Using this knowledge, a simplified computational method for evaluating ligand structural influences on cyclic ester ROP rates is proposed that may have utility for future catalyst design.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from ACS Catalysis
#5,150
of 7,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,792
of 403,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Catalysis
#118
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
