↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

2015 ACR/ACC/AHA/AATS/ACEP/ASNC/NASCI/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR/SCPC/SNMMI/STR/STS Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain A Joint Document of the…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Radiology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
guideline
4 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2015 ACR/ACC/AHA/AATS/ACEP/ASNC/NASCI/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR/SCPC/SNMMI/STR/STS Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain A Joint Document of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Committee and the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force
Published in
Journal of the American College of Radiology, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.07.007
Pubmed ID
26810814
Authors

Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain Writing Panel, Frank J. Rybicki, James E. Udelson, W. Frank Peacock, Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Eric M. Isselbacher, Ella Kazerooni, Michael C. Kontos, Harold Litt, Pamela K. Woodard, Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain Rating Panel, Joseph S. Alpert, George A. Andrews, Edward P. Chen, David T. Cooke, Ricardo C. Cury, Daniel Edmundowicz, Victor Ferrari, Louis G. Graff, Judd E. Hollander, Lloyd W. Klein, Jonathan Leipsic, Phillip D. Levy, John J. Mahmarian, Craig Rosenberg, Geoffrey Rubin, R. Parker Ward, Charles White, Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging Oversight Committee, E. Kent Yucel, J. Jeffrey Carr, Frank J. Rybicki, Richard D. White, Manesh Patel, Pamela Douglas, Robert C. Hendel, Christopher Kramer, John Doherty

View on publisher site

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 25 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 29 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,041,650
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#153
of 3,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,529
of 450,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#3
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.