↓ Skip to main content

Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity: Further Opportunities via Genomics. Response to Pimm et al.

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity: Further Opportunities via Genomics. Response to Pimm et al.
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2016.01.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 115 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 56%
Environmental Science 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Computer Science 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,759,528
of 29,276,505 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1,599
of 3,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,619
of 417,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#25
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,276,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.