↓ Skip to main content

Surgical Oncology: Evolution of Postoperative Fatigue and Factors Related to Its Severity.

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Surgical Oncology: Evolution of Postoperative Fatigue and Factors Related to Its Severity.
Published in
Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, February 2016
DOI 10.1188/16.cjon.e3-e8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Fatigue has been reported by many patients undergoing surgery and is associated with a negative prognosis. The factors associated with postoperative fatigue and its evolution during the postoperative period are unclear. Adequate fatigue measurement instruments are necessary to obtain reliable evaluations and to direct effective care to control fatigue in this patient population. This article describes the evolution of postoperative fatigue in patients with cancer as well as related factors. A review of the literature using the CINAHL® and PubMed databases was undertaken. The prevalence of moderate and severe fatigue varies during the postoperative period, with a reduction in the 12 months after surgery. Various factors (e.g., stress, anxiety, depression, pain, changes in sleep patterns) seem to influence the severity of fatigue. More evidence is needed to explore the relationship between immediate postoperative fatigue and the evolution of fatigue during the period following surgical treatment for cancer.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 2 4%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 25 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2016.
All research outputs
#31,228,352
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing
#933
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#398,397
of 452,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.