↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Headwater Streams in Downstream Water Quality1

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Water Resources Association, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 1,240)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
481 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
735 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Headwater Streams in Downstream Water Quality1
Published in
Journal of the American Water Resources Association, January 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00005.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard B. Alexander, Elizabeth W. Boyer, Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, Richard B. Moore

Abstract

Knowledge of headwater influences on the water-quality and flow conditions of downstream waters is essential to water-resource management at all governmental levels; this includes recent court decisions on the jurisdiction of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) over upland areas that contribute to larger downstream water bodies. We review current watershed research and use a water-quality model to investigate headwater influences on downstream receiving waters. Our evaluations demonstrate the intrinsic connections of headwaters to landscape processes and downstream waters through their influence on the supply, transport, and fate of water and solutes in watersheds. Hydrological processes in headwater catchments control the recharge of subsurface water stores, flow paths, and residence times of water throughout landscapes. The dynamic coupling of hydrological and biogeochemical processes in upland streams further controls the chemical form, timing, and longitudinal distances of solute transport to downstream waters. We apply the spatially explicit, mass-balance watershed model SPARROW to consider transport and transformations of water and nutrients throughout stream networks in the northeastern United States. We simulate fluxes of nitrogen, a primary nutrient that is a water-quality concern for acidification of streams and lakes and eutrophication of coastal waters, and refine the model structure to include literature observations of nitrogen removal in streams and lakes. We quantify nitrogen transport from headwaters to downstream navigable waters, where headwaters are defined within the model as first-order, perennial streams that include flow and nitrogen contributions from smaller, intermittent and ephemeral streams. We find that first-order headwaters contribute approximately 70% of the mean-annual water volume and 65% of the nitrogen flux in second-order streams. Their contributions to mean water volume and nitrogen flux decline only marginally to about 55% and 40% in fourth- and higher-order rivers that include navigable waters and their tributaries. These results underscore the profound influence that headwater areas have on shaping downstream water quantity and water quality. The results have relevance to water-resource management and regulatory decisions and potentially broaden understanding of the spatial extent of Federal CWA jurisdiction in U.S. waters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 735 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 3%
France 4 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 692 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 144 20%
Student > Master 141 19%
Researcher 130 18%
Student > Bachelor 60 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 4%
Other 109 15%
Unknown 118 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 293 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 99 13%
Engineering 43 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 <1%
Other 25 3%
Unknown 139 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,372,208
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Water Resources Association
#34
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,793
of 177,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Water Resources Association
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.