You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of prescribed fire on San Francisco gartersnake survival and movement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.21585 |
| Authors |
Brian J. Halstead, Michelle E. Thompson, Melissa Amarello, Jeffrey J. Smith, Glenn D. Wylie, Eric J. Routman, Michael L. Casazza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,549,350
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1,893
of 2,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,492
of 350,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#23
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.